Hidden within millions of pages of recently released Epstein-related documents by the U.S. Department of Justice is an unexpected alliance between Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates that focused on pandemic simulations.
This information matters for those who value informed consent and transparency.
The relationship began with Epstein’s 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution, yet Bill Gates met with him repeatedly starting in 2011—multiple times over several years.
In a 2013 email to himself, Epstein alleged that Bill Gates engaged in extramarital sexual activity, resulting in an STD requiring antibiotics. The email claimed that Gates sought to secretly administer those antibiotics to his then-wife, Melinda Gates. While Gates has denied all of this, calling it “absurd,” he later admitted regretting “every minute” of his association with Epstein.
Beyond social interactions, the Epstein-Gates connection extended into serious discussions about biological defense, health data, neurotechnology, and pandemic simulations.
An internal email dated March 3, 2017, copied to Bill Gates and Larry Cohen detailed proposed “deliverables” for work tied to bgC3, Gates’ private office and think tank (now Gates Ventures). The sender outlined plans to collaborate with Cohen and multiple Gates advisors on a scope of work focused on domestic health and neurotechnology. The proposals included developing a blueprint for a privacy-preserving digital health data system, white papers on U.S. consumer health spending and neurotechnologies for chronic disease, an assessment of neurotechnology as a national security issue, and follow-up technical recommendations for a pandemic simulation project known as “Strain.”
By October 2019—just months before the COVID-19 outbreak—the Gates Foundation partnered with the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University to host Event 201, a high-level pandemic simulation modeling a global coronavirus outbreak. The exercise envisioned supply-chain collapse, economic turmoil, mass misinformation, and sweeping government responses. Fifteen leaders from business, government, and public health role-played crisis management scenarios, and a Gates Foundation executive, Christopher Elias, participated directly.
Organizers insisted the exercise was purely fictional and not predictive. Yet, the timing is highly suspicious given that the simulated pandemic shared striking similarities with what unfolded shortly after.
When COVID-19 arrived, governments imposed lockdowns, restricted movement, and enacted widespread vaccine mandates. Regulatory agencies like Health Canada fast-tracked procurement and distribution of novel products with limited oversight.
Meanwhile, entities managing global vaccine distribution saw enormous financial gains. Chief among them was GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance—founded by Bill Gates in 1999 with an initial $750 million contribution. By the time COVID-19 arrived, Gates had invested over $4 billion into GAVI. While the organization’s stated mission focuses on vaccinating children in low-income countries, it became a key player in global COVID vaccine distribution during the pandemic.
The overlap between all of these happenings—despite Canadian taxpayers inadvertently funding this global vaccine empire—is next to impossible to ignore: prior pandemic simulations, centralized global response mechanisms, coercive mandates, and billions flowing through institutions closely tied to the same players who helped design the framework.
College-dropout Gates, with zero medical training and no democratic mandate, openly pushed for a permanent global squad of pandemic assessors to grade countries on their compliance with pandemic response plans through war-game-style drills every five years.
When viewed alongside Lockstep—a scenario from the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, which envisioned a world reshaped by fear, centralized authority, and “health security” prioritized over personal freedom—it begins to seem less like disorder and more like design.
Was this really an unforeseen emergency, or the following of a script written long before the first lockdown?
